By: Stefanie Garcia
In the world
of Texas English assessment at large, and here at the smaller world of Real
Talk Intervention, there has been a debate on whether or not a test can actually
assess an author’s intent. As an English teacher would like to weigh in on this
– no, it cannot. Yes, it is impossible to know exactly what an author was
thinking. As an author myself of many terrible high school emo poems, I
understand that sometimes, an author uses a word, or a structure, or a simile, instinctively and without guile or intent. Sometimes, the author’s intent is
just to get the feelings out.
However,
we are educators and we are not here to have esoteric conversations about individual authors and what they wanted me to think about their poem. They already got to
write it, and now it is my turn to have a go at this text, whose rights were
knowingly sold to the STAAR test creators.
I am
first and foremost a teacher and the educational reality is that discussing
and, yes, assessing the thinking that happens when students consider what the
author was “most likely” thinking is a terrific way to understand how students
are growing as critical readers and as writers. This type of critical
analysis also has transfer to other types of thinking processes. Although the
author’s intent is not known, this test is not about what the author thinks…it
is about how deeply the students can read and analyze texts.
Let me
show you – as an EDUCATOR – how author’s purpose questions reveal to me a student’s
critical reading and thinking skills using the same questions dissected by Sara
Holbrook, on her poem “A Real Case,” which was used on a STAAR 7th
reading test a few years ago. This is how I think through these questions, not
as an attempt to psychically link with the author, but from a viewpoint of
critical reading:
32 Which
lines from the poem best suggest that the speaker’s situation is temporary?
F Doubtful,/I
have a fever
G Tomorrow,/I’ll
come around
H TODAY!/It
hit like a thwop of mashed potatoes
J I
could attract mosquitoes—/maybe—not friends.
This
is about finding evidence to support an interpretation. Is it authentic that students
don’t get to make their own interpretation? No. But sitting with students, I
can tell what happened to their thinking by question response analysis. If they
picked F or J, they are struggling with getting the main idea of a text and
finding evidence. Basic stuff. No one would justifiably argue that on an
evidence based selection, F or J are valid when given the idea that this is a
temporary situation. That is the key word. The interpretation (yes, maybe this
is the test makers interpretation, so fine…we can’t tweet Shakespeare to find
out what he was thinking either) is about the condition being temporary and
they have to find evidence to defend it. Temporary is time, so obviously the
answers that have time are the best choices. To discriminate, I then look at
the two options. Only one shows CHANGE with TIME, which is the definition of
temporary. So, it doesn’t MATTER what the author wanted me to think. The
author’s time is done; the reader’s time is here.
33 What is the most likely reason that the poet uses capitalization in line 6?
33 What is the most likely reason that the poet uses capitalization in line 6?
A To
highlight a problem the speaker experiences
B To
stress the speaker’s expectations for tomorrow
C To indicate
that the speaker’s condition happens unexpectedly
D To
show the speaker’s excitement about an upcoming event
This is
about author’s craft. “Most likely” is used to remind us that this is not
actually guessing the actual author’s intent, but as a possible interpretation. Let’s look at the line
in question: “TODAY! – It hit like a thwop of mashed potatoes snapped against a
plate, An unrequested extra serving of just for now self hate.”
We know
from our experiences with other texts, and with our own writing, since we read
like writers, authors use caps to DRAW ATTENTION, so I now understand
that I am looking for the author to be making a main point here... that
prompts me to look up and down for the context of this line. Then I have to
analyze the entire line that goes with 6, which is that “TODAY!” is an actual
HIT in the head.
We take
the time as readers to visualize this idea, and we think...huh…feels quick and
violent and unexpected and right now. So it can’t be B, because that is about
tomorrow and not about today…. And excitement has a positive connotation, so it
can’t be that since “snapped” on the plate with a “thwop” and is distinctly
negative. When I look at the differences between the words “expectations” and
“unexpectedly”, I see these are opposite terms. I notice this because I am not
just analyzing the text, but the QUESTIONS. It is ALL a part of my critical
reading skill. And then, I see the answer that is quite clear to all of my kids
who use Stephanie Harvey’s reading strategies that C is the best because of
that specific word…unexpectedly, which goes with the poem’s word “unrequested”.
34 Read
the following lines from the poem.
The poet includes these lines most likely suggest the speaker –
F does
not wish to be pushed on a swing
G wants
to deal with the situation alone
H does
not often receive help from others
J is
not physically strong
We are
trying to infer intent from specific text evidence, which is an ELA standard in
7th grade. It looks harder in her article because she leaves out the
text box with the lines to which she refers. It is dealing with the line
“And if you try to push my mood swing, I’ll only drag my feet.”
As
funny as Sara Holbrook is here, some kids actually do read this as being an
actual literal swing that someone is pushing. Because sadly, many kids are
still developmentally struggling with abstractions. And it is not funny that
they don’t get this type of metaphorical thinking. I need to know this!
If they
picked A, I know they are dealing with a critical understanding break down.
Thank you STAAR test! The same with J…has nothing to do with the line, so it is
a gimme. If a kid answers these, we have to work on their comprehension. G and
H are ok, and are both probably true to the entire poem, but which one is
specific to those lines? Only G…she says if I try to help her, it will make it
worse! But see, I know that because I can read this concrete image and
understand the abstract idea behind it…and I want to know kids can do that,
too.
These
are aligned questions to seventh grade ELA standards. And they are assessing
their critical thinking! I want this in my kid’s tests. I want to know he can’t
do this so I can help!
According
to “The Truth About Testing” by WJ Popham, test makers are creating valid
assessment items when those items are specific to the standard, and when they
require students to use a body or knowledge or skills, and/or use their own
evaluation in order to judge response quality. That is what these items do: I
have to use close reading/vocabulary knowledge/author’s craft understanding in
order to infer author’s “most likely” intent for using a specific technique,
and then using evidence, evaluate each answer choice provided to me to
determine the most appropriate.
I am
never going to tell my students that test taking is not an important skill to
have. They will have to take a lot of certification and qualification tests in
their lives, and they will take tests in high school, and college, and grad
school, and even on Buzzfeed. I can’t have these kids melting down when they do
Trivia Night at Sherlock’s ten years from now! I want them to win that $25 gift
certificate to Jamba Juice!
The current thinking of “everyone
is entitled to their opinion” is indicative of the relativistic thinking
typical when adolescents realize the uncertainty of knowledge. Looking for
evidence to back up inferences teaches students how to have substantiated opinions
on texts, and that not every statement in writing can be taken at face value.
And in the era of post truth and fake news, the skills of discrimination
between multiple options and reading for intent and purpose could literally
save the world.
Comments
Post a Comment